Maybe you subscribe to some del.icio.us feeds in your RSS reader. Probably means you have a del.icio.us account… Is it a one sided fence? Certainly not. Would there be the RSS feeds if other people didn’t have an account? No… because you’d be the only one tagging anything. So, there are people who have an account, and there are people who subscribe to the RSS feeds. Now, since a lot of the people reading the RSS feeds also have an account, let me help you help those people - the ones on the other side of the fence. Your del.icio.us neighbors, if you will.
Tag Appropriately
I’m not sure where ohskylab comes from thinking that How to avoid crying when chopping onions goes under the gtd tag. I’m perfectly fine with that going under cooking, food, lifehacks (since it was posted on lifehacker), and onions. The tag gtd for most “sane” people means Getting Things Done. Now, no offense to my friend ohskylab, but how does knowing how to not cry when cutting an onion help me Get Things Done? Do I get to move on to the Next Action faster because I don’t have to wipe me eyes after cutting up the onion? I guess so… And I guess I also increase my Mind Like Water state since all that saline stays in my head instead of coming out through my tear ducts. If you think the gtd is okay, then let’s move on. If you agree with me that it’s a bit overkill, you can skip down to the next headline.
Still there? Good, then you’re ready to look at food. Now, an onion is definitely food. On the surface, we’re Good2Go. But does knowing how to cut an onion belong in food when it’s also under cooking? If so, then nearly every cooking post could would also be tagged as food, and that makes the food tag kind of redundant, no? Speaking of redundant… if an onion is food, does it really need to be tagged as onions? Is there every going to be a time when you tag something as onions, but not food? There is The Onion… but I don’t think that would get tagged as the plural “onions” but rather the singular “onion” or perhaps even “theOnion.”
Which leads unceremoniously to my next point…
Reduce Overtagging
How Many Tags Do You People Have?? ONIONS? You have a tag for ONYUNS?? For Cry Pete! I’m not sure who ohskylab is, but he/she’s got 16.5 pages (on 1400x1050 resolution) of tags! That’s a {expletive} ton of tags. I like to use my del.icio.us account as a time-saving device, as opposed to a time-wasting device. I still do a horrendous job of saving things (I save way too much stuff that I will most likely never look at again), but I consciously try to keep the number of tags I have low to reduce the amount of time I have to spend looking through tags to remember what I tagged something as. (On a related note, you can search your del.icio.us bookmarks. Related like brother and sister, it is.)
Tag What You Need
Once again lacking all ceremony: My Next Point… Once you read how to cut out the bottom of an onion before cutting apart the rest of it, do you really need to save the page? Chances are, if someone is subscribed to the lifehacks tag at del.icio.us, they’re also subscribed to lifehacker.com and lifehacks.org and lifehackmetopieces.co.uk as well. They’re going to find the same information you are, and they’re never going to really need to look at it again either. Until they go senile. Which will probably be when computers (or else onions) have been advanced to the point where they’re nothing like anything we currently have anyway.
Summary
1. Tag Appropriately - don’t stick square pegs in round holes just because the holes are bigger than the squares
2. Reduce Overtagging - if you have more than about 2 screens of tags, that’s probably more than you really need. “Your focus determines your reality.”
3. Tag What You Need - are you really going to look at it again?
I am certainly going to examine the tagging process again… just you wait. Until then, Look Now Look Again.